18 комментария

1. MAYBE US BEER CANS WILL DOUBLE IN PRICE? THIS COULD HELP YOUR LIQUOR SALES?

   Ответить

2. AI generated

   Ответить

3. The American Emperor said we need nothing from Canada,that is what Canada should be aiming at no canola oil no oil from Alberta no Aluminum no electricity no electricity from Ontario no tourism no rare elements no fertilizer.Waken up help the Emperor with his wish for nothing from Canada

   Ответить

4. The biggest surprise wasn't Canada's success… it was how a 50% tariff may have pushed Europe to become Canada's better customer. Did Washington accidentally strengthen the competitor it wanted to weaken?

   Ответить

5. The purpose of tariffs is to raise Canadian prices so US CONSUMERS will purchase us products. Thus creating AMERICAN JOBS. Trump wants to develop us aluminum manufacturing. Canada can sell its products to the rest of the world. BTW carbon free does not exist on buyers purchase orders. BTY. CANADIAN dollars is at 70% of us. Lowest in 15 years. Elbows up!

   Ответить

6. If a US domestic aluminum industry is really strategic to America, then the US government may need to either a) legislate the price that utilities are to sell electricity to US aluminum production sites, or b) own the utilities that provide the electricity for aluminum production. Otherwise, economics dictates that cheap (hydro) electricity will drive where aluminum will be produced.

   Ответить

7. THIS ENTIRE CHANNEL IS AI SLOP CONTENT!

   Ответить

8. There is nothing new about the Liberals; they are the same as ever. They simply installed Trudeau's mentor in the position without an election.The CAQ did the same thing, seeing that it had worked for the Liberals.
   How is it possible that the Liberal Justice Minister is still in office after being caught with over 250 videos of child pornography on his personal computer and more than 150,000 documents implicating him in fraud?

   il n'y a rien de nouveau dans les libéraux,ce sont les mêmes,il ont juste mis le mentor a Trudeau a sa place sans election ,la CAQ a fait pareil voyant que cela avait marché avec les libéraux
   comment cela fait il que le ministre de la justice libérale sois encore en fonction après avoir été pris avec 250+. de vidéo porno juvénile dans sont ordinateur personnel et plus de 150 milles documents de fraudes l'implicant dans des fraudes

   Ответить

9. I repeat, electric cars are an ecological disaster: 1. To make the batteries, you deforest, which increases the carbon and methane that you tax us following the extraction of minerals; 2. The drinking water used to wash the minerals is discharged into areas that feed into the groundwater from which we now draw our water; 3. The batteries are mainly made of plastic that is not recyclable, not reusable, and not biodegradable. In China, kilometers of electric cars rot in the countryside, and to get rid of them, you sell them here in Canada. They cost a fortune in electricity, and look at us increasing our electricity bills. There is nothing good and nothing green in what you call ecological and economical.Not to mention the animal extinction this causes by destroying their natural habitats, it is estimated that more than 1000 animal species disappear each year and nothing is being done to improve the situation; on the contrary, some are kept in zoos and the rest are wiped out.

   Je le répète, les voitures électriques sont un désastre écologique : 1. La fabrication des batteries nécessite la déforestation, ce qui augmente les émissions de carbone et de méthane, dont l’extraction minière nous coûte cher ; 2. L’eau potable utilisée pour le lavage des minéraux est rejetée dans des zones qui alimentent les nappes phréatiques dont nous tirons notre eau ; 3. Les batteries sont principalement composées de plastique non recyclable, non réutilisable et non biodégradable. En Chine, des kilomètres de voitures électriques rouillent dans les campagnes, et pour s’en débarrasser, on les vend ici, au Canada. Elles coûtent une fortune en électricité, et regardez nos factures d’électricité augmenter ! Il n’y a rien de bon ni de vert dans ce que vous appelez écologique et économique. Sans parler de l’extinction des animaux causée par la destruction de leurs habitats naturels : on estime que plus de 1 000 espèces animales disparaissent chaque année, et rien n’est fait pour améliorer la situation ; au contraire, certaines sont gardées dans des zoos, tandis que les autres sont exterminées.

   Ответить

10. In the 2030 Agenda, they announced that oil would be permanently banned, so we looked for less devastating and polluting alternatives to replace gasoline and hydrocarbons. Hydrogen remains the cheapest to produce; its combustion produces oxygen, an essential element for all life on Earth, and produces no greenhouse gases or carbon emissions. Therefore, we invested in hydrogen engines, which seem to have either been shut down, banned, or stolen.

    dans l'agenda 2030 ,ils annoncent que le pétrole sera définitivement interdit donc nous avons cherché des solutions alternatives moins dévastatrice et polluantes pour remplacer l'essence et l'hydrocarbures reste la moins chère a produire,a la combustion cela produits de l'oxygène, éléments essentiels a toute vie sur terres et ne produit aucun effets de serre ou de carbone,nous avons donc investi dans les moteur a l'hydrogène,qui semble soit avoir été fermé, interdit ou volé

    Ответить

11. The US, not stating, the reason, for aluminum destination shift. They want their old price, the EU, is paying more. Guess where the metal gets shipped???🤣

    Ответить

12. weaken?

    Ответить

13. A major structural issue is Canada’s long‑standing reliance on rapid population growth to mask weak productivity. From 2016 to 2024, Canada grew rapidly. This boosted GDP but strained housing, infrastructure, and public services. As population growth slows, underlying weaknesses—low productivity, high business costs, and limited innovation—become more visible. Without strong productivity gains, Canadians experience rising costs without rising prosperity.

    Trade dependence is another critical vulnerability. Canada sends roughly 75% of its exports to the United States, meaning about one‑fifth of Canada’s entire GDP depends directly on U.S. demand. The U.S., by contrast, sends only about 18% of its exports to Canada and has a far more diversified economy. This asymmetry means that any disruption in Canada–U.S. trade would be catastrophic for Canada but only moderately disruptive for the United States.

    A complete shutdown of bilateral trade would cause immediate and severe consequences for Canada. The auto industry would collapse within days due to its integrated supply chains. Energy exports—including oil, gas, and electricity—would be stranded. Agriculture, forestry, and mining would lose their primary buyer. Canada also imports a large share of its fresh food and consumer goods from the U.S., meaning shortages and price spikes would occur almost immediately. The U.S. would experience disruptions in the auto, lumber, and energy sectors, but its larger, more flexible economy could adapt by sourcing alternatives or expanding domestic production.

    Compounding this vulnerability is Canada’s non‑compliance with several obligations under the USMCA, according to both U.S. and Mexican officials. Disputes include dairy market access, the digital services tax, auto rules of origin, biotech approvals, and regulatory delays. These issues create Canadian‑generated trade uncertainty, undermining investor confidence and weakening Canada’s position ahead of the 2026 USMCA review. While Canadian media often frames trade tensions as U.S. unpredictability, both the U.S. and Mexico have stated that Canada is the outlier in compliance.

    Given this dependence, the question arises: can Canada replace U.S. trade through diversification? Realistically, not within a decade. Even with aggressive efforts, Canada cannot replicate the scale, proximity, and integration of the U.S. market. Cutting U.S. dependence from 75% to around 50% is possible over 10–15 years, but full replacement would require 20–30 years of infrastructure expansion—ports, pipelines, rail corridors—and a complete reengineering of supply chains.

    Deep trade integration with Europe, Asia, and India can expand Canada’s global footprint, but these regions will not sacrifice their domestic industries to absorb large volumes of Canadian exports. Canada’s export profile—energy, autos, agriculture, lumber, minerals—overlaps with the most protected sectors in these economies. Their political systems prioritize shielding farmers, automakers, steel producers, and strategic industries. Canada lacks the leverage to force concessions, and its infrastructure is oriented almost entirely toward north–south flows. Rebuilding for east–west trade would take decades.

    In summary, Canada faces a complex economic landscape defined by modest growth, severe affordability challenges, and deep structural vulnerabilities. The gap between official statistics and lived experience reflects long‑standing weaknesses: declining real incomes, sectoral instability, reliance on population growth, and overwhelming dependence on the U.S. market. Diversification is possible and necessary, but no major trading partner will harm its own industries to rescue Canada, and no diversification strategy can replace the U.S. in the near term. Canada’s economic future depends on addressing these structural issues rather than relying on population growth or external partners to compensate for them.

    Ответить

14. The US throws away over $1billion of aluminum every year (mostly cans) rather than recycling a material that can be recycled almost infinitely.

    Ответить

15. Trump gets to eat his own words. We will soon find out just HOW the US gets by without us…. Pass the popcorn

    Ответить

16. More Liberal propaganda. Guess Quebec won’t need the $10billion Carney just gave them. Quebec bleeds Canada.

    Ответить

17. Vive le Québec libre!!🎉❤

    Ответить

18. Bravo for my Canadian brothers dozing draft dodging Donald Trump said America doesn’t need anything from Canada. Guess this idiot is wrong again elbows up.

    Ответить